Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Airport Noise contour supplied by Christchurch International Airport Ltd. 50 decibel aircraft noise contour. Published in the notification of the decisions made by the Regional Council on the Commisioners' recommendations to Proposed Plan Change 1 to Regional Policy Statement regarding the Urban Development Strategy 19-Dec-2009. The Daiken NZ MDF Plant located in Ashley has 45 decibel contour that coincides with the heavy industrial zoning and the opposite property across Upper Sefton Road. The Rangiora Airfield has a 65 decibel noise contour that prohibits residential and noise sensitive activities and a 55 decibel that requires sound insulation for residential activities. The Woodford Glen Speedway has a speedway noise contour limiting residential activities inside the contour. The speedway is located to the south east of Kaiapoi and covers predominantly rural lifestyle zoned land.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Indicative only for purposes of measurement.
Name: Qualifying Matter National Grid Subdivision Corridor
Display Field: SOURCE
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The Qualifying Matter National Grid Subdivision Corridor shows the area where the National Grid Subdivision Corridor overlaps with the Medium Density Residential Zone. The corridor is based off a 39 metre setback from power-lines in that area.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Indicative only for purposes of measurement.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:Qualifying Matter - Natural Hazards as defined by the Waimakariri District Plan. This area shows where the Medium Density Residential zone (area A) and the General Residential zone (area B) in Kaiapoi overlap with the High Flood hazard area from the 500 year Flood Hazard model.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Data has been digitized based on LINZ parcel boundaries. Accuracy may vary.
Color: [0, 77, 168, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Name: Qualifying Matter Open Space and Recreation Zone
Display Field: Shape_Length
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:Qualifying Matter - Open Space and Recreation Zone as defined by the Waimakariri District Plan. This area shows where the Open Space and Recreation Zone lies adjacent to any Town Centre or Local Centre Zone areas (within urban areas only).Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Data has been digitized based on LINZ parcel boundaries. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:Qualifying Matter - Rail Corridors as defined by the Waimakariri District Plan. This area shows where Rail Corridors overlap the Town Centre Zones in urban areas.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Data has been digitized based on LINZ parcel boundaries. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The Woodford Glen Speedway has a speedway noise contour limiting residential activities inside the contour. The speedway is located to the south east of Kaiapoi and covers predominantly rural lifestyle zoned land.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. While care has been used in compiling these boundary coordinates, Statistics New Zealand gives no warranty that the data supplied is free from error. Statistics New Zealand shall not be liable for any loss suffered through the use, directly or indirectly, of any information, product or service.Abstract:Definitive territorial authority boundary for 2013 as defined by the Local Government Commission and/or the territorial authority but maintained by Statistics New Zealand (who are the custodian). A Territorial Authority is defined under the local government act 2001 as a city or a district council and are defined at meshblock and area unit level.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Imported on Oct. 20, 2016 from Geodatabase in NZGD2000 / New Zealand Transverse Mercator 2000.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Transmission Lines is a polyline dataset representing the power lines that are used to transmit electric power across NZ, usually from a power generating station to main substations that make up the National Grid. They are comprised of overhead and underground conducting lines of either copper or aluminium. In NZ these High Voltage (HV) transmission lines operate at kilo Voltages (kV) of 220kV and 350kV. (Transmission Line is not a topological network.) (Spans are a sub-set of the Transmission Lines data set. Spans record the structure from / to and the length between the structures). The Transmission Lines dataset is updated ad-hocly.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Accuracy +- approx. 3m
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Name: Major Electricity Distribution Lines (66kV/33kV)
Display Field: id
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolyline
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Location of Mainpowers 66kV and 33kV lines for review for their potential inclusion in WDC planning documents.Based on GPS position of support poles.Accurate to approximately 6m.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Accurate to approximately 6m.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Transmission Lines is a polyline dataset representing the power lines that are used to transmit electric power across NZ, usually from a power generating station to main substations that make up the National Grid. They are comprised of overhead and underground conducting lines of either copper or aluminium. In NZ these High Voltage (HV) transmission lines operate at kiloVoltages (kV) of 220kV and 350kV. (Transmission Line is not a topological network.) (Spans are a sub-set of the Transmission Lines data set. Spans record the structure from / to and the length between the structures). The Transmission Lines dataset is updated ad-hocly.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Accuracy +- approx. 3m
Name: Major Electricity Distribution Setback Corridor
Display Field: OBJECTID
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Location of Mainpowers 66kV and 33kV line corridors for review for their potential inclusion in WDC planning documents. The setbacks are used to control how close activities can get to poles as underneath ground within the National Grid Yard. The New Zealand Electricity Code of Practice for Electricity Safe Distances (NZCP 34:2001) is used to form the basis of setbacks within the District Plan.Based on GPS position of support poles.Accurate to approximately 6m.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Accurate to approximately 6m.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Notable Trees contribute to the character and amenity values of the District, and their loss or modification can have a significant impact on an environment.A tree is assessed as being notable under the Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM). Notable Trees must meet assessment criteria that determine that the tree’s condition, amenity and notable values are high enough. The criteria include the trees age, occurrence, vitality, stature, and any historic associations or scientific rarity. Notable Tree assessments were carried out in November and December 2019. All trees were surveyed from ground level, with a visual tree assessment (VTA) and STEM evaluation carried out. Photographs of each tree or group of trees were taken, including close ups of any significant tree defects. No soil samples or tree samples were collected. Notable Trees are privately-owned. Trees within Council-owned land are protected and managed under an alternative process.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage:Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Historic Heritage contributes to the environmental qualities, amenity values and character of the District, and is vulnerable to modification, damage or destruction from inappropriate subdivision, use or development. Historic Heritage Items are defined by the Waimakariri District Plan as:“a. means those natural and physical resources that contribute to an understanding and appreciation of New Zealand’s history and cultures, deriving from any of the following qualities:i. archaeological:ii. architectural:iii. cultural:iv. historic:v. scientific:vi. technological; andb. includes—i. historic sites, structures, places, and areas; andii. archaeological sites; andiii. sites of significance to Māori, including wāhi tapu; andiv. surroundings associated with the natural and physical resources.”Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage:The data has been gathered through field surveys undertaken for the district plan review process in 2019 - 2020. Aerial photography and land parcel data was used to digitize the heritage features described in the field survey documentation. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Waimakariri District Council (WDC)
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The scheduled freshwater bodies have been identified as having some natural character features. The list of natural character features include those attributes identified in the NZ Coastal Policy Statement and the National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management. There are three groups of Scheduled Freshwater Bodies shown, Schedule 1 are those that contain the highest number natural character features, and as such have the largest setbacks. Schedule 2 and 3 freshwater bodies contain less natural character features and as such have reduced setbacks. Not shown are unscheduled freshwater bodies, which are those freshwater bodies that have not been assessed. The map shows the outline of the freshwater body delineates the channel edge of the freshwater body. The setbacks identified in the chapter are to be applied out from the edge of the water bodies and are used to identify land parcels that will be affected by the rules.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Name: Scheduled Natural Character Freshwater Bodies 50m
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The scheduled freshwater bodies have been identified as having some natural character features. The list of natural character features include those attributes identified in the NZ Coastal Policy Statement and the National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management. There are three groups of Scheduled Freshwater Bodies shown, Schedule 1 are those that contain the highest number natural character features, and as such have the largest setbacks. Schedule 2 and 3 freshwater bodies contain less natural character features and as such have reduced setbacks. Not shown are unscheduled freshwater bodies, which are those freshwater bodies that have not been assessed. The map shows the outline of the freshwater body delineates the channel edge of the freshwater body. The setbacks identified in the chapter are to be applied out from the edge of the water bodies and are used to identify land parcels that will be affected by the rules.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Name: Scheduled Natural Character Freshwater Bodies 20m
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The scheduled freshwater bodies have been identified as having some natural character features. The list of natural character features include those attributes identified in the NZ Coastal Policy Statement and the National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management. There are three groups of Scheduled Freshwater Bodies shown, Schedule 1 are those that contain the highest number natural character features, and as such have the largest setbacks. Schedule 2 and 3 freshwater bodies contain less natural character features and as such have reduced setbacks. Not shown are unscheduled freshwater bodies, which are those freshwater bodies that have not been assessed. The map shows the outline of the freshwater body delineates the channel edge of the freshwater body. The setbacks identified in the chapter are to be applied out from the edge of the water bodies and are used to identify land parcels that will be affected by the rules.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Name: Scheduled Natural Character Freshwater Bodies 10m
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The scheduled freshwater bodies have been identified as having some natural character features. The list of natural character features include those attributes identified in the NZ Coastal Policy Statement and the National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management. There are three groups of Scheduled Freshwater Bodies shown, Schedule 1 are those that contain the highest number natural character features, and as such have the largest setbacks. Schedule 2 and 3 freshwater bodies contain less natural character features and as such have reduced setbacks. Not shown are unscheduled freshwater bodies, which are those freshwater bodies that have not been assessed. The map shows the outline of the freshwater body delineates the channel edge of the freshwater body. The setbacks identified in the chapter are to be applied out from the edge of the water bodies and are used to identify land parcels that will be affected by the rules.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:This information resource comprises a digital dataset of the boundaries on the 1:500,000 published maps of ecological regions and ecological districts of New Zealand, which are part of McEwen (1987) (refer related resources). Ecological regions and districts are subdivisions of New Zealand into contiguous and discrete areas that have relatively homogenous physical (climate, soil, topography, geology) and biological characteristics (including cultural pattern, i.e. land use). Ecological regions are generally an aggregate of adjacent ecological districts with very closely related characteristics.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Data has been produced by Department of Conservation and modified in places based on analysis done by Wildlands Consultants Ltd for the District Plan Review.
Copyright Text: Department of Conservation New Zealand. Wildlands Consultants Ltd and Waimakariri District Council planners assisted with editing the boundary of the Oxford Ecological District.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:The road hierarchy shown on the planning map shows only those roads classified as collector roads, arterial roads, or strategic roads. Any other road not shown is a local road.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Road Hierarchy data was created to conform to road centre-lines based on LINZ parcel data. Indicative only.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:Suggested fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay for the Waimakariri District Plan, May 2020.The suggested Waimakariri fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay comprises all fault awareness areas in Waimakariri from the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset, as recommended in Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211. See this report, and the metadata for the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset, for more detail on how the fault awareness areas were delineated.The fault awareness areas show areas where there may be a surface fault rupture hazard. Surface fault rupture is the permanent breaking, ripping, buckling or warping of the ground on or near the line where a fault meets the ground surface, as a result of movement on the fault. It is different from earthquake shaking.The suggested Waimakariri fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay is where the fault rupture hazard should be specifically considered and the fault rupture deformation areas mapped as part of a consent for important or critical infrastructure or facilities (as defined in the Waimakariri District Plan).Descriptions of the attribute fields:Name: Fault name, taken from the district fault name field (e.g. WDC_name) in the district fault datasets. Some of these have been changed from the original district fault names to make them consistent with what is given in the district fault report.Zone:Fault zone that the fault is within, if any.Certainty:The level of confidence that the mapped feature is in fact an active earthquake fault - definite, likely or possible. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.Surface form:How clearly the mapped feature can be seen at the ground surface - well expressed, moderately expressed, not expressed or unknown. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.Min RI:Minimum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.Max RI:Maximum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.Min RI Class:Minimum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al, 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Some values have been changed to better match the minimum fault recurrence interval.Max RI Class:Maximum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Type:Whether the mapped feature is a fault (fault reaches the ground surface) or a monocline (fault stops below the ground surface but forms a fold in the ground surface).Buffer m:Whether a 125m or 250m buffer has been applied to the fault to create the fault awareness area as per Barrell, et al, 2015.Other technical fields, such accuracy, sense of movement, dip direction, down quadrant, trend and facing, as well as territorial authority (all Waimakariri) have been removed for simplicity but this information can be found in the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:This dataset has been created as recommended in Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211. A 125m or 250m buffer was placed around the mapped fault traces to create this polygon dataset, depending on how certain the fault is, and how well expressed it is at the ground surface. Definite (well expressed and moderately expressed) fault and monocline records and likely (well expressed and moderately expressed) fault and monocline records have a 125m buffer, recognizing that the mapped location of the fault is fairly well constrained and is reasonably close the actual location. All other faults and monocline records have a 250m buffer, recognizing that the mapped location is not as well constrained. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for a full description of the method used to create this polygon dataset, and recommended actions for each type of area.
Copyright Text: Created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury, May 2020, based on the Canterbury Fault Awareness Area 2019 dataset.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract:Extent of the Ashley Fault Avoidance Zones. Areas of well-defined and distributed deformation have a 20 m buffer applied as per the Ministry for the Environment guidelines. Areas of uncertain and extended deformation were considered by the report authors to not have been mapped precisely enough to warrant assigning a 20 metre buffer. The joins between the well-defined and distributed deformation (with 20 m buffer) and the uncertain and extended deformation (without 20 m buffer) have been manually adjusted slightly to smooth out any sharp edges. The well-defined and distributed deformation areas (with 20 m buffer) have also been clipped out of adjacent uncertain or extended deformation areas.'Feature' is the type of ground deformation present.'FAZ_class' is the category of fault complexity, set out in Table 2 of the accompanying report, and following the MfE active fault guidelines.'NAME' is the fault or other landform unit that the deformation is associated with.'BUFF_DIST' is the width of the added buffer (20 m on well-defined or distributed deformation, 0 m on uncertain and extended deformation). Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:The data were captured at a scale of 1:5,000 to 1:10,000. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury, April 2020 for the Waimakariri District Plan review. Based on mapping and data in Barrell, D. J. A.; Van Dissen, R. J. 2014. Assessment of active fault ground deformation hazards associated with the Ashley Fault Zone, Loburn, North Canterbury, GNS Science Consultancy Report 2013/173 / Environment Canterbury Report No. R14/77.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata. Abstract:Esplanades as defined in Waimakariri District Plan Chapters 3 and 33. The esplanades overlays identifies water bodies where esplanade reserves or strips are proposed to be taken by Council in accordance with Sections 77 and 229 of the Resource Management Act. An esplanade reserve or strip is usually taken for conservation purposes, public access or to enable recreational use (Section 229 RMA). For the Waimakariri District Council the flowing water bodies have been identified as being appropriate for esplanade reserves and strips: Cam River, Coastal Margins, Courtnay Stream, Cust River, Kaikanui Stream, Kaiapoi River, North, Middle and South Brooks, Ohoka Stream, Saltwater Creek, Taranaki Stream and Waikuku Stream.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Light Protection Area as defined in the "General District-Wide Matters - Light" chapter of the provisional district plan. The Oxford Observatory Light Protection Area Overlay is intended to limit the amount of outdoor lighting events in the evenings and encourage the shielding of outdoor lights and illuminated signs. The overlay covers a diameter of 4km centred at the Oxford Area School on Bay Road.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary. Indicative Only.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Airport Noise contour supplied by Christchurch International Airport Ltd. 50 and 55 decibel aircraft noise contour. Published in the notification of the decisions made by the Regional Council on the Commissioners' recommendations to Proposed Plan Change 1 to Regional Policy Statement regarding the Urban Development Strategy 19-Dec-2009. The Daiken NZ MDF Plant located in Ashley has 45 decibel contour that coincides with the heavy industrial zoning and the opposite property across Upper Sefton Road. The Rangiora Airfield has a 65 decibel noise contour that prohibits residential and noise sensitive activities and a 55 decibel that requires sound insulation for residential activities. The Woodford Glen Speedway has a speedway noise contour limiting residential activities inside the contour. The speedway is located to the south east of Kaiapoi and covers predominantly rural lifestyle zoned land.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Indicative only for purposes of measurement.
Color: [168, 112, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 2 Size: 12 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
LICENSE_DESCRIPTION
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: LICENSE_DESCRIPTION, length: 50
, Coded Values:
[Copyright owner permission required for use: Copyright owner permission required for use]
, [Freely available work must be attributed for use: Freely available work must be attributed for use]
)
Name: Rangiora Airfield Take Off Climb and Approach Obstacle Limitation Surface
Display Field: OBJECTID
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) Advisory Circular AC139-7 & AC91-15 addresses Aerodrome Standards and Requirements— Aeroplanes at or below 5700 kg MCTOW–Non Air Transport Operations (18 December 2009)While the aerodrome current exists and meets CAA standards of particular relevance to the PPC is the change to the Take-off climb/approach surface in clause 3.2.1 of the circular. This requires that each runway should have a takeoff climb and approach surface which should:(a) Rise from the end of the runway strip; and(b) Be obstacle free above a gradient of 1:20; and(c) Extend horizontally 1200 m from the inner edge; and(d) Have sides that are splayed outwards at the rate of 1:20; and(e) Not turn before 300 m from the inner edge, if a turn is necessary.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage:Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The purpose of the proposed designation comprises two parts:i. For the land owned by Waimakariri District Council to be recognised for providing for efficient and effective airport facilities and operations; andii. For the balance of the land within the identified 65dBA, the purpose is more constrained, and seeks only to protect the efficient and effective use of the airfield operations. The designation does not extend the airport activities or associated works onto this land.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract:The Waimakariri coastal environment is located within the central part of Pegasus Bay and extends approximately 15 km from the Waimakariri River mouth to the Ashley River / Rakahuri Mouth and includes Saltwater Creek estuary. This central, east-facing part of Pegasus Bay represents one of the smaller coastal environments contained within the Canterbury region. Much of the coastal environment comprises sand dunes backed by pine plantations and is reasonably homogenous, contained by two river systems, the Waimakariri River to the south and the Ashley River / Rakahuri to the north. Modification of the interdune vegetation communities has been substantial. Farmland and townships are evident immediately beyond the pine plantations. The Study Team determined that due to the level of modification apparent in the coastal environment, that there were only a few areas that reached the Level 4 mapping scale of high and very high natural character. These were generally concentrated areas that typically included wetland communities and included: 1. Saltwater Creek/ Ashley River / Rakahuri Mouth, which was mapped and rated Very High 2. Te Kohanga wetland, which was mapped and rated High 3. Tutaepatu Lagoon, which was mapped and rated High 4. Jockey Baker Creek, which was mapped and rated High These areas displayed high and very high levels of abiotic, biotic and experiential aspects of natural character, due to their lack of modification. Typically, these areas were contained by farmland, or commercial forestry which effectively confined these areas to localised areas. Of these areas, and after reappraisal under the outstanding methodology, only one area managed to reach the outstanding natural character threshold, which as Saltwater Creek/ Ashley River / Rakahuri Mouth. This was primarily due to the extensive intertidal mudflats and saltmarsh habitats that support an abundance of invertebrates as well as a significant variety of bird and fish life. Levels of modification are very low.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:This data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ property boundaries. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Heritage Settings are designed to protect heritage values of Historic Heritage items. Heritage Settings are defined by the Waimakariri District Plan as: “an entry in HH-SCHED2 - Historic Heritage Items which, with the associated historic heritage, has met the significance threshold for listing. A heritage setting is the area surrounding and adjacent to historic heritage that is integral to its function, meaning and relationships and may include individually listed historic heritage. A heritage setting includes:a. buildings;b. structures or features, such as fences, walls and gates, bridges, monuments, gun emplacements, whale pots, lamp stands and public artworks;c. gardens, lawns, mature trees and landscaping water features, historic landforms;d. access, walkways and cycleways, circulation, paths and paving;e. open space; andf. spatial relationships.”Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage:The data has been gathered through field surveys undertaken for the district plan review process in 2019 - 2020. Aerial photography and land parcel data was used to digitize the heritage features described in the field survey documentation. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Waimakariri District Council (WDC)
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Significant Natural Areas layer showing all areas that contain remnants of indigenous vegetation that have significant biodiversity value and are critical for preventing the extinction of rare species and loss of ecosystems. All SNA overlay parcels have been assessed by an ecologist. Only features with a Site_Name_2021 value are shown in the District Plan.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage:The data has been created using aerial imagery and site visits during the District Plan Review process in 2019 - 2020. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract:Coastal Marine Area Landward boundary within the Canterbury Region as shown in the Canterbury Regional Coastal Environment Plan 2005. The Coastal Marine Area Boundary (CMA) along the line of Mean High Water Springs (MHWS) and where it coincides with a river or stream, a distance of either one kilometre upstream from the mouth or a distance equivalent to five times the mouth of the river upstream.,MHWS has not been surveyed on the Canterbury coast. Therefore, this indicative line cannot be used as a legally defined line due to the margin of error involved. In the event of any dispute as to the precise location of the line of MHWS Environment Canterbury undertakes to establish the line for that specific area.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:The areas in this Schedule are defined through the use of New Zealand Map Series grid referencesdelineating the boundaries of the relevant area within the Coastal Marine Area. The grid references are givento the nearest 100 metres. In some cases these grid references do not provide sufficient accuracy to exactlydesignate the area. This is because the line defining the boundary of the area may not start or end at a gridreference on shore exactly at the boundary of the Coastal Marine Area. Where the line crosses the CoastalMarine Area boundary the area is fully defined. However, where the line defining the boundary of an areafalls short of the boundary of the Coastal Marine Area, the relevant grid reference shall be interpreted asbeing the nearest point at the boundary of the Coastal Marine Area.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract:District plan designations as defined by the Waimakariri District Plan. Spatially identifies where a designation is included under section 168 or section 168A or clause 4 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Designations data has been digitized using LINZ parcel data and aerial imagery. Accuracy may vary, indicative only.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: The coastal study has been undertaken as an independent technical assessment and has been subject to input by a terrestrial ecologist.Following agreement with WDC concerning the methodology, the study team refined the inland extent coastal environment and identified two coastal areas. This task involved using GIS and the original 2012 ECan alignment. Careful analysis of the inland extent of the coastal environment was determined on detailed aerial photographs and this was further refined through a site visit along the extent of the boundary.No stakeholder input has been provided into the preparation of this study, but it is understood that this study will provide a basis for consultation through the DPR process.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: All landscapes are dynamic, they are continually changing as a result of the combination ofnatural processes and changing land uses and activities. Sometimes, changes in land use alterlandscapes in a way that conflicts with the special attributes that the community values abouta landscape or natural feature. Consequently, there is a need to manage landscape change,particularly in those landscapes most valued by the community. A key step in developingpolicy to manage landscapes is to undertake an assessment, to identify, evaluate and mapthose valued landscapes. If robustly and rigorously applied, landscape assessment shouldinform both the approach and decision making process relating to how landscapes are, or canbe managed. Information to assist this process is provided in the final section of this report.This assessment has been prepared in response to the Council’s obligations under theResource Management Act (RMA) and Canterbury Regional Policy Statement (RPS).The Operative Waimakariri District Plan contains ONL provisions that were prepared in the mid1990s. Since that time landscape assessment methodologies have evolved throughenvironment court case law and the revised RPS now specifies the ‘matters of assessment’ tobe considered in the assessment of landscapes to identify ONFs and ONLs.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract:Kaiapoi Fixed Floor Level map shows recommended relative levels within Kaiapoi that should be used as minimum floor levels for natural hazard sensitive activities (buildings with one or more habitable rooms and/or contain one or more employees and/or a place of assembly).The Reduced Levels shown on the Kaiapoi Fixed Floor Level map have been determined from delineating areas or basins within Kaiapoi that have no natural overland flowpath. The RL for each area is calculated based on the 200 year flood level plus freeboard. RL, or ‘reduced level’ refers to identifying survey points with reference to a common assumed datum – in this situation the common datum is the Lyttelton 1937 Vertical Datum. An RL of “2” shown on the Kaiapoi Fixed Floor Level map means that floor levels need to be built a minimum of 2m above this level.The freeboard used in each area varies from 300mm to 500mm and is dependent on the hazard due to flooding in each area. The areas encompassing Otaki Street and Bracebridge Street have additional freeboard applied to reflect the additional risk associated with pump failure in both of these catchments.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District Council.Lineage:Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 14 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Description:While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract:Waimakariri District Plan Zones as defined in the Zones chapter of the district plan.Update Frequency:As needed.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage:Zones have been digitized to match with LINZ parcel boundaries and road centre-lines (derived from road parcels). Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Waimakariri District Council (WDC)
Color: [170, 102, 205, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [137, 137, 68, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 12 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 200000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 255, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [205, 102, 153, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [205, 102, 102, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [205, 102, 153, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [170, 102, 205, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [215, 215, 158, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 170, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [130, 130, 130, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [168, 0, 132, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [255, 115, 223, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [38, 115, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [114, 137, 68, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [137, 112, 68, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 12 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 200000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [92, 137, 68, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [130, 130, 130, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [245, 122, 182, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 15000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [0, 38, 115, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Cultural sites data and concepts can largely be attributed to the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy for the Canterbury Region. All advice given to WDC through the various engagement systems is borne of the information policies contained within these documents.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy.
Description: Cultural sites data and concepts can largely be attributed to the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy for the Canterbury Region. All advice given to WDC through the various engagement systems is borne of the information policies contained within these documents.Description:While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Cultural sites data and concepts can largely be attributed to the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy for the Canterbury Region. All advice given to WDC through the various engagement systems is borne of the information policies contained within these documents.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Cultural sites data and concepts can largely be attributed to the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy for the Canterbury Region. All advice given to WDC through the various engagement systems is borne of the information policies contained within these documents.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Cultural sites data and concepts can largely be attributed to the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy for the Canterbury Region. All advice given to WDC through the various engagement systems is borne of the information policies contained within these documents.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy.
Description: While the Waimakariri District Council has taken all reasonable care in providing correct information, all information should be considered as being illustrative and indicative only. Your use of this information is entirely at your own risk. You should independently verify the accuracy of any information before taking any action in reliance upon it.Read the full disclaimer here.A full description is available in the Metadata.Abstract: Cultural sites data and concepts can largely be attributed to the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy for the Canterbury Region. All advice given to WDC through the various engagement systems is borne of the information policies contained within these documents.Update Frequency: As required.Point of Contact:Waimakariri District CouncilLineage: Data was digitized using aerial imagery and LINZ parcel data. Accuracy may vary.
Copyright Text: Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013 and Te Whakatau Kaupapa: Ngai Tahu resource management strategy.